| |
In article <34EF8CFD.26C9 earthlink >, piictam earthlink wrote:
>Allen wrote:
>>
>> My GTI VR6 has only 19K on it. It started to make this ungodly noise when
[...] 6 lines deleted
>> Allen
>> 95 GTI VR6
>
>
> What do you consider cheap ( in $$$)? If you mean by under 100 bucks,
[...] 5 lines deleted
>them.
>
>
>Ian Tam
>86 GTI
I'll second that - the $46 Ferodos are probably the best bang-for-buck
pads I have tried. I've also tried Hawk Blues, which were
spendy($80-100?) and DESTROYED rotors. If I laid on the brakes with the
windows open while inhaling, I could taste the rotor dust, which also
stuck to all my magnets, turned my wheels black in 3 runs......but the
Hawks were like switching gravity to horizontal against your flow of
travel. They STOPPED. Sick pads, but way too rotor unfriendly. A set of
Porterfield R4(the race compound) pads found their way onto my car, a
friend had bought them before abandoning the project. 90% as powerful as
the Hawks, but don't munch rotors, are pretty clean, and seem to last. I
like these, also about $100. Never tried the Ferodo Race pads - went from
those to the Hawks. Probably next set will be Ferodo races, but that
won't be for a while, if these Porterfields keep wearing at their current
rate. I'd do the Ferodo street pads - for autocross, they're awesome.
Cheap, not too dusty(compared to a Hawk, the Sahara is not dusty, YMMV),
don't need to be hot, don't fade, etc. Great pad, I just wanted that
little bit more, which costs a LOT. Worth it? Shrug, I don't know -
brakes are hard to use. Too much/early, you go slow. A fraction too
late, you go slower. Brakes are difficult tools to use to your(mine,
anyhow) advantage. I like the Porterfield - not a decelerative assault
pad like the Hawk, but more than the Ferodo Street. They'll do what I tell
them to, no surprises - the Hawks were a bit tricky to modulate - the line
between threshold and lockup was really thin. Hope this helps!
I.Mannix
|